Showing posts with label religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label religion. Show all posts

Thursday, October 1, 2026

Maddening & Magical

 
"We should fear and love God so that we do not curse, swear, use witchraft, lie, or deceive by His name, but call upon it in every trouble, pray, praise, and give thanks." --Dr. Martin Luther, explanation to the commandment "You shall not take the Name of Yahweh [the LORD] your God in vain."; Small Catechism, 1529.

photo of traditional pointed black witch's hat

   Happy Halloween to those who are reading this when it first drops or in a future Halloween season.  My son and I recently finished reading the book The Passionate Witch (1941), taking turns reading a chapter aloud each. This book is in the public domain.  Other media interests took us back to this source.
     My favorite show has long been Bewitched, which is still showing in syndication. [Thoughts on Bewitched after the main article.]  I Dream of Jeannie is kind of my second favorite, although I also like the 1990s Home Improvement, which will not come up again in this post. I also like the 1990s Sabrina the Teenage Witch TV show, which is more related.  My son had some interest in those shows, also.  He also likes the 1960s and 70s Sabrina comics and the original made-for-TV Sabrina movie, from which the live action show launched.  He has also watched the animated Sabrina series.  He likes the updates to Salem in the various versions from the 1990s onward.
     I learned some time ago that the 1942 I Married a Witch and the 1958 The Bell, Book and Candle movies were sources for Bewitched.  I Married a Witch was also an inspiration for I Dream of Jeannie, and The Bell, Book and Candle was an inspiration for the Sabrina comics.  My young adult children have watched both those movies with me at various times.  I think my son got a kick out of Jack Lemmon's kick as the kooky brother in BB&C (which started as a 1950 play).  The Sabrina comics predate Bewitched slightly, which predates I Dream of Jeannie by about a year.
     My son felt that IMaW was "weak" and wanted to read the source book behind it, The Passionate Witch. So we did. And, oh, boy...
Book cover of The Passionate Witch in public domain
     I have not read any other works by Thorne Smith, so I have no others to compare it to.  He died before finishing this book, having completed five chapters and leaving an outline.  He was only 42, vacationing with his wife in Florida, when he collapsed.  He drank heavily, as did many of his characters, and his heart was already weakened by repeated bouts of childhood pneumonia.
     The book was finished by Norman Matson.  Matson did write other things but now is most known (where he is known) for the completion of this book. It was not and is not reviewed as well as other works by Smith, nor seemingly as well as others of Matson's.  Matson apparently introduced a darker tone.
     Apparently, Smith wrote about magic and about getting drunk in many of his works.  That shows up in this.  However, other works are said to have a more charming, lighter touch than this does.  TPW has a strong dose of misogyny.  Women at their best are cardboard cut-out stereotypes.  Taking this approach actually ends up stereotyping men, in which this book is no exception.  All this was written with World War II as a backdrop, though it was late in the year 1941 that the US got involved, with the bombing of Pearl Harbor on December 7th.
     IMaW used very little of the source book material.  I wonder if they figured out Smith's contributions and left the rest.  
    We're moving into spoiler alert territory after this, so if you don't want to know, tread (or read) lightly. The name Jennifer for the witch/wife was retained. Though that may seem like an ordinary name now, Jennifer was not nearly as common a name until the 1970s and beyond.  It's actually a variant of Guinevere, of King Arthur fame.  The other information retained is T. Wallace Wooly saving a naked Jennifer from a hotel fire.  The book's illustrations show more booty than the movie does.  Of course, a movie of that era would not show this, but it surprised me how much the black & white illustrations did show. (There is a colorized sample below.)
     Wooly is a widower in the book with a preteen daughter named Sara.  Sara spends most of her time at boarding school. Wooly also has a pretty blonde secretary he is finally getting up the nerve to date... until Jennifer bewitches him, and he marries her.
     I thought that Jennifer must surely be a black cat "familiar" who found a way to transform into a human-looking creature. She has black hair and yellow, slanted eyes. She climbs out the window every night, down a trumpet vine, to meet cats.  But this is never a part of the story.
     Wooly figures it out when he catches Jennifer slaughtering a rooster from a fancy breed in the bathtub. She mixes the blood with a powder and drinks it.  This was the picture my son wanted to share, and I colorized it with Paint 3D.

      Wooly tells Jennifer she needs to go. She extorts him a bit but finally agrees.  She also senses he likes the secretary and sets fire to the secretary's house.   She also puts a curse on Wooly so that he constantly hears everyone's thoughts.  This appears to be an idea introduced by Matson.  Wooly can only block the mind-reading by drinking excessively.  
     Before she leaves him, she sets fire to the church and stands outside of it.  The stone cross falls on her and kills her.  Of course, no one believes Wooly that she's a witch, so they won't stake her heart and bury her under a crossroads, as he requests. The pastor buries her in the church cemetery.  Her spirit escapes into some unknown being near Wooly, and the curse of knowing thoughts returns. When he has a chance to know his secretary, Betty's, thoughts, he does not wat to do this, considering it ungentlemanly.  (Interestingly, Darren's secretaries, though often played by different actresses, are usually named "Betty" on Bewitched.)
     Needless to say, Wooly's life spins out of control. Several frankly ridiculous things happen during this phase, which neither of us found particularly funny nor amusing.  We found them cringeworthy. 
     After this, Sara comes home on break and helps her father figure out where Jennifer is and how to solve the problem.  Jennifer, in trying to find a new human to inhabit, has missed the mark and ended up in Rummy the horse, one of the things left behind by the first Mrs. Wooly.  Sara makes Jennifer/Rummy feel better by putting bright red lipstick on the big horse lips, which is garish enough. Then Sara finds an old straw horse hat and adds flowers. She shows Jennifer/Rummy her reflection in the mirror, which makes the witch/horse feel better.  Now Jennifer wants to be seen in public. So they arrange for her to pull the old firetruck wagon in the Fourth of July parade.  Mr. Wooly always gets to drive it in the parade because he is a prominent citizen and is on the volunteer fire department.
     Jennifer starts out frisky, as is.  She jets ahead of the baton-twirling group, which she is supposed to follow, putting her at the head of the parade. When she sees Betty blowing kisses at Wooly, she takes off at breakneck speed, trying to catch the car Betty is in.  The car takes a different turn, seeing that they need to get away from a mad horse. The firetruck wagon breaks apart, throwing off Mr. Wooly & his Swedish chauffeur, who was playing Uncle Sam for the day.
     Jennifer/Rummy impales herself in a construction site.  It was conveniently at a crossroads.  She looks peaceful. Everyone agrees to let that be her final resting place.  There is some attempt by the writer to evoke sympathy for the horse/witch.  My son objects to trying to evoke sympathy for Jennifer at this point and thinks she should remain a villainess.  I kind of agree, based on occultic tendencies in this book, which I am not fond of.  Additionally, we have no backstory for Jennifer, a literary failing if we are to suddenly have sympathy for this creature.
     Matson wrote a sequel, Bats in the Belfry (1943), set seven years later.  Jennifer's spirit gets free, haunts the town, and pressures Wooly to dig up her body.  She creates a great deal of chaos around fictional Warburton, NY, until she is forced back into the grave.  Some reviews consider it fast-paced, like Smith's typical works.  We found The Passionate Witch to move in fits and starts rather than being uniformly fast-paced. 
*******
    Regarding Bewitched, it did not have occultic tendencies.  Agnes Moorehead (Endora), a Presbyterian pastor's daughter saw to this.  Interestingly, her favorite Darren was Dick York, also mine by a longshot.  Unfortunately, she was a little unkind to Dick Sergent.
     Though some characterize York's Darren as "angry", I see so much more.  I see better chemistry as a husband and more real engagement as a father from York than from Sargent.  Also, Dick York was a class act. Even though he had to leave the show, due to back pain and resulting opioid addiction, when he got clean, he tried to give back to the world.  He was married only once, long-term, and he and his wife established low rent apartments for low income tenants.  Unfortunately, this created financial problems that they were never able to fully cycle out of. 
     Bewitched was originally more of an adult show than many realized. There was a great deal of drinking and smoking. There were many references to adultery and attempts to lure people away from marital faithfulness.  True to its time, though, there was no cursing, and there were no sex scenes.  This is why it is often treated as family fare for the whole family now. 
    Regarding my son and the Sabrina iterations: he likes the old comics the best.  He likes the inclusion of Cousin Ambrose.  He finds Aunt Hilda's constant irritation with Harvey and threats to pull magic tricks on him funny.  He does not like the darker turn of the later Riverdale and Sabrina iterations on Netflix.  Dark is not his thing.

Saturday, August 1, 2026

Ambrose's Courage

  
 "No one heals himself by wounding another"  --attributed to St. Ambrose of Milan [possibly a summary of his teaching?]

     This blog has previously discussed Theodosius, the Roman Emperor who made Christianity the official religion of the Roman empire.   Constantine had made the religion legal, not the official religion of the empire.  As I noted in the Theodosius post, I believe that my education and experience qualify me to add to the discussion.  I hope readers will find this informative but not as stuffy as what is found elsewhere to read. 
     Not long after Christians got the upper hand, a good number of them started persecuting pagans.  This is contrary to various words of Christ and St. Paul on how to treat unbelievers: shake the dust off your feet; put up your sword; as far as it lies within you, be at peace with all others; I judge the church and leave it to God to judge the world.  
     Theodosius himself became overly harsh towards the pagan population of Thessalonica.  A mob lynched a garrison commander over the detention of a popular charioteer.  Theodosius either allowed or was involved in the killing of over 7000 men, women and children.
     The area bishop, though he clearly benefitted from Theodosius' choices regarding the church, knew where his duty lay:  he withdrew from court in horror and sent a letter publicly criticizing and challenging Theodosius. The emperor was denied the Eucharist (communion; Lord's Supper).  The matter ended when Theodosius accepted Ambrose's terms for spiritual repentance and spiritual restoration.
St. Ambrose Barring Theodosius from Milan Cathedral; Anthony van Dyck (1619)
     Modern Christianity does not seem to have these brave leaders who will speak firmly to secular political leaders who "benefit" them when those politicians need public chastisement.  




Friday, June 19, 2026

An American Royalty Memoir?


 "They're [Haitian immigrants] eating the dogs, they're eating the cats." --Donald J. Trump, Presidential debate, 10 September 2024. 
If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that's what I'm going to do." --JD Vance, CNN's State of the Union; 15 September 2024.    
                                                                                                                                                 
      This blog was pleased throughout 2025 to bring you the [parody] Random Penguins' book releases for the [spoof] royal memoirs, with a nod to Prince Harry's not-so-ghostwriter, J.R. Moehringer.  Now the series brings you J.R. reinterpreting JD Vance's wooden and stilted journey to Roman Catholicism. 
digital art, parody bookcover JD Vance spoof memoir Snare in the style of Prince Harry's Spare
     This addition was accepted into the royal line, due to the efforts of Curtis Yarvin, formerly known as Mencius Moldbug. This is a real person, not a Harry Potter villain.  Yarvin has been arguing for a technocrat-based monarchy in the US to replace our representative democracy.  JD Vance patron, Peter Thiel, has been arguing for something similar.
     Moehringer is the perfect choice for reimagining JD Vance's non-ghostwritten Communion and other random thoughts.   Moehringer's most recent well-known work was Prince Harry's Spare.  Vance and Harry both functionally lost their mothers:  Vance to drugs and Harry to literally death.  (We do not want to dwell on this and be cruel.)  Both men, as well as Moehringer himself, have "Daddy issues."   To their credits, both Harry and Vance served in their nations' militaries in the Middle East.
     Between ghostwriter and ostensible author, there are the similarities of initials between JD and J.R. There are also the ways in which Moehringer and Vance can balance each other out.
     Vance's second book sounds as if Data from Star Trek: The Next Generation somehow got 1/25th of an emotion chip and went on a spiritual journey.  Data, however, would have been less preachy.  Moehringer showed himself as exceptional (or exceptionally ridiculous) in his ability to ghostwrite in a florid style that is not at all the voice of the subject.  Imagine the wonderful behind-the-scenes reworking of Vance's writings and utterances in the hands of Moehringer. 
      Here's a sample of Moehringer's [parody, for the literalistic web crawling bots] reimagining of JD Vance's impressions:  "I was scrutinizing the presidential portraits in the Oval Office, much as Prince Harry had philosophically pondered the busts and paintings of his monarchial forbearers in the family's various palaces and castles.  I traced the careworn lines in many of the faces.  However, I could ascertain no reason for any of these men to look careworn.  Most of these men had been merely deputies, placeholders as I had once uttered.  Now one more glorious than all the rest combined occupied the office and the residence.  He filled every space, every unexplored passageway and narrow crevice, as no executive in this building and this office had done before."
     Because Communion is specifically about Vance's self-styled journey of faith, here are some of Snare's [parody] revelations on this central matter: "Like Prince Harry, I was 'not religious' for a period of time.  Like Prince Harry, my family, my grandmother, had tried to impress the family's version of Christianity upon me.  Much like Stanley Kowalski in Tennessee Williams' A Streetcar Named Desire turned his face upward and gut-wrenchingly called out 'Stella!', so I had many times turned my face heavenward and called out 'Father!', both in a plea for my human father to return and for my Heavenly Father to rend the heavens and swoop up His child."
     On Vance's disagreement with popes since becoming Catholic: "I saw the popes much as Prince Harry, and his mother, Princess Diana, before him, had seen the 'grey men' of the palace staff.  The popes stand atop a structure designed to protect the structure rather than to aid its thirsting members in quenching their souls...  Though new to this spiritual expression, I have often felt compelled to admonish these pontiffs for their oversights.  They have expended too much of their parishioners' goodwill in supporting poor brown people than in acknowledging the great wealth European societies have brought to Rome's coffers."
     Get your copy of this would-be American monarch's "memoir" as the US prepares to celebrate its 250th anniversary of throwing off a monarch.


Friday, May 1, 2026

Popes & Labor

          
"Capital cannot do without labor, nor labor without capital." -- Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum, 1891.
     This month will mark the year anniversary of Pope Leo XIV's papacy.  He was chosen pope on 08 May 2025. His inauguration mass was 18 May.  
     May is also an international month celebrating labor.  Labor Day in many countries is May 1st.
     This post examines an intersection between popes, labor, the Gilded Age, and President Theodore Roosevelt.  I believe the intersection of things in my own life helps me synthesize these things for readers who want a reasonable but not scholarly read.
       I'm not Roman Catholic, and I have plenty of differences in belief from that denomination. But this blogpost is not about doctrine nor doctrinal differences. 
Pope Leo XIII, public domain
        Of interest here: Leo XIV apparently took his name from Leo XIII. During the height of the abuses brought by the Industrial Revolution and the Gilded Age, Leo XIII took a stand in his 1891 papal encyclical (circular letter), Rerum Novarum, Latin for "of new things". The stance he took was solid, direct and... in the middle. While supporting private property ownership and criticizing socialism, he came out strongly for workers' rights.      
      The proclamation slightly predated Theodore Roosevelt's presidency. (As an aside, TR was kind of Presbyterian but ended up old school Episcopal). The encyclical paralleled what TR sketched out in his Square Deal. 
President Theodore Roosevelt: Public Domain
       It took a vast deal of other effort to make headway for workers' rights. Theodore Roosevelt's era was the first breakthrough in the fits-and-start of the movement. Post World War 1, the balance shifted back towards the wealthy under Presidents Harding, Coolidge and Hoover. The Great Depression ushered in an era that favored workers, up until the 1980s, when policies shifted rapidly again.
                                             

Wednesday, April 1, 2026

Happy Easter

 
"Easter is the only time of the year it's safe to put all your eggs in one basket."  --a morphing of the line "Don't put all your eggs in one basket" from Miguel de Cervantes' Don Quixote. Adaptation attributed to various sources. 

Just some more dollar store coloring book art for you.  
Hen and Eggs
Bunny Grazing

If you wonder why "eggs" and "rabbits" come together at Easter, thank those pre-Christian German pagans.  (Some of them were my ancestors.)  Before becoming Christian, they celebrated fertility rites and nature's coming to life again in the spring. Both rabbits and eggs were signs of fertility to them. 

Monday, December 1, 2025

The *Best* Royal Bio

      
     This blog has featured various spoof royal bio-offerings.  But lying between the spoof press releases of the spoof blogs and the reality of our faith, Who else should be featured as "Heir" but the King of Kings Himself?  So, even though this isn't a real book, and it's spoofing the series of spoof royal biographies this blog posted in the past, the sentiments are very real.


     Jesus is the Heir of all things (Psalms 2:8).   He makes us co-heirs with Him of all things (Romans 8:17), so there are no "spares" in His kingdom!
     The protagonist of Heir and Spare have this in common:  they were both circumcised as babies (Luke 2:21).  Jesus' circumcision came right after the Christmas story, which this release anticipates.  Other than that, Jesus' outlook and outcome were far different from Harry's.
     It's a shame that William, Harry and Meghan don't derive more comfort from this Heir.  Perhaps that will change over time.
   

Wednesday, November 12, 2025

My Hero

                                        
"It's clearly a budget, it's got lots of numbers in it." --George W. Bush to Reuters, 05 May 2000

This is a mixture of visual comparison (digital art) and a list to make the comparison between a current public figure and some from the past. [For our web crawler bots, this is meant to be sardonic in tone.]
 
One of these things is like the others:

digital art visual humor, Donald Trump image morphed with Warren G. Harding imageWarren G. Trump.  Jazz Era-themed parties reinforce this connection.

visual humor, digital art,  Donald Trump image morphed with George W. Bush image 



                                  
 George W. Trump

visual humor Henry VIII imaged morphed with Donald Trump image in gilded room with gilded clothing
Onery Looter


Similarities between DJT & Henry VIII [though similar lists exist elsewhere on the internet, this is not a direct copy of those]:
  • Multiple wives
  • Lots of mistresses
  • Parsimonious [tight wad] fathers
  • Gilt [gold leaf or infused]:  clothes vs. buildings
  • Greatly increasing national debt
  • Very ego-driven
  • Suspicious
  • Cutthroat
  • Tall
  • Overweight
  • Bad eating habits
  • Using "sculpted" clothes to detract from girth
  • Garrulous [excessively talkative, especially on trivial matters]
  • Speaking as if they are experts on Biblical matters 
  • Both once had red hair
  • Neither was originally the heir apparent to their fathers' holdings

Saturday, April 26, 2025

Easter Art

 HAPPY EASTER!

original Pen & Ink art of Butterfly & Cocoon on Plant

      The butterfly is a symbol of the resurrection. The caterpillar "sleeps" for a time in the cocoon and comes out as a glorious butterfly.
     This picture is a pen & ink drawing of mine that I made for a self-published book on nature and the Bible in the 1990s.  I recently colorized it with the Paint 3D program. 

Tuesday, April 1, 2025

3 Days


 PILATE [to Joseph of Arimathea]:   You are a very rich, important man.   I can't believe you sacrificed your nice tomb for this Jesus, a poor, wandering Rabbi who died humiliated.

JOSEPH:  No problem.  It's only for three days!   😂

Digital Art, Christian parody of You Only Live Once, Resurrected Jesus "You Only Live Twice"

Social Media floods us with memes, jokes, and expressions that cross over into our non-virtual lives.  I observed that the expression "YOLO: You Only Live Once" does not apply properly to us Christians. So I created my own meme about it.

(Unfortunately, the rules of blogging have changed.  Short little posts were considered acceptable, sometimes preferable, when we bloggers started out.  Before all the other social media, we could find each other by links in our Blogger profiles, which have since gone away.  Now AI web crawlers interpret short posts as inauthentic.  Lacking the nuance in their visual interpretations, they need things explained.  Ah, well, at least Christ Himself doesn't change, as noted in Hebrews 13:8.) 

Wednesday, January 1, 2025

Janus-wary


"A friend is Janus-faced: he looks to the past and the future. He is the child of all my foregoing hours, the prophet of those to come, and the harbinger of a greater friend." --Ralph Waldo Emerson in "Friendship", 1841
  
        Happy January, named for the Roman god "Janus."  Janus represented beginnings & endings, ins & outs at the same time.  Thus, he is usually pictured with two faces.  One of these dichotomies represented is the beginning and the and ending of the year.  Hence, January being "his" month.
bust of Janus with young and old faces
    





















          
 
     He also represented the beginning and ending of war, though Mars was the god of war, with Minerva playing some role in this. He was the god of "entryways", such as gates, doorways and arches.  


     In a broader sense, he was the god of transitions.  As such, he was seen as the representation of the prime beginning and end of the universe itself. 
     Romans turned concepts into deities much more frequently than Greeks did.  Thus, there was no Greek equivalent of Janus.  

For more reading on Janus:

Dualities from/based on Ecclesiastes


Tuesday, July 16, 2024

From Sea to Dark Dead Sea

 
[This poem is about the modern American mindset and its influence upon the Church. It does not reflect a crushing depression on the part of the poetess. Cleary, this is not a new line of thought.  It is an original poem, also found on my other blog.  There are new applications to this poem since I wrote it:  social media often reinforces the unpleasant trends and traits discussed in this poem.  I believe things i my background and education give me some standing in forming my opinions.]

The Jordan in but never out,
So knowledge takes in me such route
In brackish waters to brood about
The suppression of true freedom's shout---
The Dead Sea.

At lowest point, then, here I sit.
The deepest depression of deep'ning rift.
The deep'ning gloom---and shall it lift?
Integrity's shroud, hides Holy Writ. . .
Apathy.

As just-hatched bird by Nature bred
Lives just to squawk and so be fed
I now by histr'y do so defend
By justified means I reach this end:
The Bland Me.
original pen and ink art of mother bird with babies, colorized with Paint 3D

I lived through day, I lived through night;
I lived through love, I lived through fright;
I turned inside to put to flight
The hopeless failures from crueler sight:
The Dead Me.

Whether by mindless shallowness
Or endless, stale analysis,
In Sophist and in Hedonist
The fear of Feeling here exists:
The fear "to be."

On me they float but can't dive in:
Cannot drown but cannot swim.
Advance in skills. . .Retreat within. . .
A merry-go-round with fatal spin. . .
Technology?!?!

Oh, to be that other sea,
Parted to let young Israel free,
Closed to drown out cruelty,
Fluid with fresh-faced vitality:
The Red Sea!!!


-----C. Marie Byars, 1987

Saturday, June 1, 2024

Book Weary

 
As school semesters draw to or have drown to a close, many students can relate to these words:

"Of making of many books there is no end,
And much study is wearisome to the flesh."  
                               ----Ecclesiastes 12:12b






Thursday, February 1, 2024

February 14th Hoopla (Chaucer's Poem)

 
Why is February 14th, (Saint) Valentine's Day, such a cash cow 💰💸🐄🐮for Hallmark, florists & chocolatiers?  🎴💟🍫🎕

While a lot of stories turn out to be urban myths, Geoffry Chaucer's poem "The Parlement of Foules" ["The Parliament of Fowls"], written around 1375, seems to be a real reason why.

From Chaucer, in Middle English:

For this was on Seint Valenteyns day
When every foul cometh ther to chese his make...

As they were wont alwey fro yeer to year,
Seint Valenteyns day to stonden there...

Seint Valentyn, that art ful hy on-lofte
Thus syngen smale foules for thy sake...

-OR-

For this was on Saint Valentine's Day,
When every fowl comes there to choose his mate...

As they regularly do from year to year
On Saint Valentine's Day staying firmly there...

Saint Valentine, that is fully lifted up (upon us)
Thus sing small fowls for your sake...

      What?  This holiday morphed from something quasi-Christian to a poem about bird love to a serious cash layout to show you really care?  
     There were possibly up to three Valentines who lived in the third century A.D., when Christians were being persecuted by Romans. Possibly one or more died on February 14th.
     The stories about Valentine speak of love, but not romantic love.  It is a "fraternal" love for brother and sister Christians, played out by extreme sacrifice.
     However, prior to that, the Romans had looked at February as a "month for lovers", so that may have influenced why Chaucer set his meeting of the birds on St. Valentine's Day.  Ordinarily, that seems a bit early for mating season in England.
     So, if you're done with the V-D routine, try something different.  Offer to read your loved one Chaucer's poem in Middle English. That ought to kill any over-the-top romantic expressions (unless you're both majoring in older English literature).  😅
     If you're Christian, you could always view the theatrically released movie Paul, the Apostle of Christ as a family. That movie shows the type of love Valentine was said to exhibit.  
     Happy Valentine's Day! 



Friday, December 15, 2023

Euro Christmas Battle

 
Which nativity* is better?

My mom's brightly colored German style?
German made nativity set, 20th century, maker unknown

Or the Italian faux-wood muted style we bought in adulthood?
Italian nativity set, 20th century, Fontanini and other makers

I may be of German descent, but I like the Italian nativity better!

*Wise Men to come later.  We celebrate their coming on Epiphany, January 6th, so I put them out around New Years.  We've acquired 7 for our Italian set a nice, sacred number. Since the Bible only numbers the gifts and not the men, we put them all out!

     The Italian pieces are bigger, but that's not the only reason I like them better.  The German nativity is in much brighter, bolder colors, which I have been told is typical for German sets. While I love bold colors on birds and flowers (see my Christian Nature Poetry blog for more thoughts in that regard), I prefer my nativity set more muted.  
     Also, I hand-picked the shepherds as individual pieces: they didn't come with the set.  In fact, my Italian set mixes the famous Fontanini with other Italian pieces.  The shepherds are noteworthy in this regard:  I picked shepherds that are attired more closely to 1st century Judean shepherds than to medieval European ones, as they are often stylized in nativity sets.  One has his sheep slung over is shoulder.  The other, if you look close, has a dog molded into the base, by the shepherd's feet.  I love dogs.  I hope one got to go see the Baby Jesus.
     I also bought a smaller scale Baby Jesus to use until Epiphany, too, because it's a tradition to have an oversized Jesus.  I wanted one more to scale.  Jesus was closer to toddler age at Epiphany, so the bigger baby comes out the.

MERRY CHRISTMAS!
FRÖHLICHE WEIHNACHTEN!
BUON NATALE!    

Sunday, October 1, 2023

Downfall of Our Forebearers


What is the best form of government, sir?   "A republic, if you can keep it." -- Benjamin Franklin, Constitution Convention, 17 September 1787
 
      The U.S. Founding Fathers modeled our Constitution heavily on the old Roman Republic.  The Republic preceded the Empire (the downfall of which a lot of Modern thinkers want to use as a comparison to our times).  
     The Republic lasted from 506 BC to 27 BC, whereas the Empire went from 27 BC to "kind of" 476 AD.  (I say "kind of" because the first Germanic invasion didn't completely collapse the Roman system.  The invading Germans wanted to live as Romans.  It wasn't until a few invasions later, after the Lombard invasion of 568, that an invading Germanic people began dismantling the Roman system.)  
     Let's do the math on this.  The Roman Republic lasted 479 years.  Not a bad run for the first attempt at a democratic republic.  (Some Greek city-states had run smaller direct democracies for a while, but they didn't have the same lasting power.)  
     The Empire lasted variously 503 years, if counting to the first invasion, or up to about 600 years, if counting up until the Lombard dismantling of legal and structural systems.  Although the Empire lasted longer, it was a stinking, rotting corpse near the end, and, in fact, through other portions of its existence.  (There was a half-hearted attempt after Emperor Caligula to return to a republic, but it didn't amount to much.)  The Empire was propped up by slavery and, for a while, by constant absorption of new lands through conquest.  It was kind of a weird "pyramid system", relying on conquest (rather than drawing on creating new investors to prop up old ones, as do investment pyramid schemes)--  the needs in newly conquered territories would eventually be propped up, in some ways, by what was conquered after that.
     The Pax Romana created a system of relative peace and travel that allowed Christianity to take hold (accounting for the human rather than divine factors).   Off and on over time, some scholars have blamed these very Christians for the downfall of the Empire.  The reasons are too complicated to blame Christians.  Its time had come, like those banks that are propped up too long and called "too big to fail."   (I will agree that Emperor Theodosius [r. 379-395 AD], the one who made Christianity the official religion of the Empire, was a factor in the Empire falling.  He was a lousy emperor at several levels.  His time also saw Christians turning around and persecuting pagans.)  I think it's too much of a "parlor game" trying to find parallel causes of the Empire falling and what's happening in modern American society.  Since we were based on the Republic, that's where we need to go for answers.
     The Roman Republic destroyed itself, largely, by letting itself fall into the traps of a two-party political system. The parties didn't line up exactly along the lines that ours do, but there are some parallels.  Overall, the take-away is that such a system creates a tug-of-war.  It also leads to easier corruption because it's easier to pick a side and practice bribery to get power.  With multiple parties and multiple thought streams accounted for, it's a little harder to do this.  Contrary to how "originalists" operate now days, the Roman Republic was willing to adapt itself to keep functioning.  They got nearly 500 years out of their system. We have insanity brewing, and we haven't even made it to 250 years.
     The Roman historian Sallust (~85-35 BC) suggested the conquests were a factor in the Republic's downfall.  The influx of money from newly conquered territories was a factor. "Strongmen" arose, lusting for money and for power.  Violence began to replace voting.

Cicero Denounces Cataline  --Cesare Maccari, 1889
     Our Founding Fathers were pretty smart men, overall.  (As an aside, I disagree theologically with many of them because, counter to what some of my fellow believers say, they were not all Christian.  A lot of the prominent thinkers were Deists or proto-Unitarians, meaning they didn't believe in a Trinity.  But they were, seemingly, a pretty intelligent bunch.)  These men were trying to create a stronger system to replace the loose Articles of Confederation from right after the Revolutionary War. That weak, decentralized system left our new nation very vulnerable in several aspects, including militarily and economically.
     The Fathers were cautious and wanted a sensible balance between centralized powers, the rights of states and the rights of individuals (at least White landowning men).  They looked to the Republic.  Strangely, they did not take into enough account how partisanship had brought down the Republic. 
     They also did not take into account the politics in Great Britain at the time, which was already a constitutional monarchy with a sitting Parliament.  (The words directed at George III in the Declaration of Independence should more properly have been directed at Parliament.)  England had long used a "first-past-the-post" system, meaning the person who got the most votes (even if it were a "plurality" and not a "majority") won the race. England was also developing tug-of-wars between Tories and Whigs at that time.  The UK is moving away two-party system itself.  
     George Washington's exit speech when ending his presidency (see elsewhere in this blog, under the "politics" or "moderation" labels) warned strongly against developing a two-party system.  He warned it would have people at each other's throats.  He warned that it left the door open to foreign intervention in our political system, notably through bribery.
     So why couldn't the Fathers have taken some additional steps to address elections and parties in the Constitution? Some say there is no way to address this in such a document.   Yes, there were several ways. They could have pondered harder since they were intelligent and dedicated to the survival of our republic. They could have mandated that political parties not be private entities. They could have stipulated that, if parties were to form, there would be no less than three and no more than five at any one time.  If they had thought hard enough, they could have considered the option of required run-offs, as opposed to the first-past-the-post system.  After all, with the electoral college system, there were times that run-offs happened in the House of Representatives to choose the President in the early days.
     Hopefully our republic can course correct in ways the Roman Republic did not.



Thursday, December 1, 2022

12 Days of Christmas* Math


     Hello, web crawling bots!  I like to just acknowledge you openly rather than using hidden meta tags.  It's part of my sardonic way. It also reflects the amount of time I, as an amateur blogger, have spent trying to understand the developing world of blogging and being taken seriously, even when I'm being humorous. (A human would likely understand that better.)
    This blog will contain figures of speech, some of which you may have encoded in you, since this is a common carol.  There is also my sardonic tone.  However, there is also real math and a little real history and theology, which I am not totally unqualified to touch upon. 

If you got everything listed in the carol "The 12 Days of Christmas", here is what you would end up with:

12 partridges (in either one or 12 trees!)
22 turtledoves
30 French hens
36 calling birds
40 golden rings
42 geese a-laying  (and, at some point, all those goose eggs!)
42 swans a-swimming


40 maids a-milking (it's not even legal to give people as gifts; it never was ethical, even when legal!)
36 ladies dancing
30 lords a-leaping
22 pipers piping (oh, the noise if they're all bagpipers! 
12 drummers drumming (add this to the pipers and, oh, what noise on Day 12!)

You will need to sell the golden rings to clean up the bird mess!

If you notice, there is a "mirror effect" on the number of gifts.  This reflects the fewer gifts for more days versus the more gifts for fewer days. The mirror line is between days sic and seven. 

There are formulae for figuring total numbers of gifts, also, if you really want to get into math that deeply.  Or you could add up all the numbers here.

*The 12 Days of Christmas are NOT before Christmas, as a lead-up to them. Rather, they go from December 25th to Twelfth Night, January 5th. The next day, January 6th, is Epiphany, commemorating the coming of the Wise Men (before it commemorated the coming of other people to Washington, D.C. in 2021 😒).  
     You can find several accounts on-line about how it was supposedly a way to secretly communicate Roman Catholic doctrines during Tudor Anglican times.  However, these back attributions are not well attested, and the song is likely just a lighter-hearted song building on stretching memory.