Tuesday, September 1, 2026

A More Gentlemanly Manner

"For what do we live, but to make sport for our neighbours, and laugh at them in our turn?" - -Jane Austen in Pride and Prejudice (1813); Mr. Bennett to Lizzy (near the end of the book)
book cover of 1906 edition of Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice book
University Press edition, 1906

   Part of Lizzy's response to Mr. Darcy's first proposal in Pride & Prejudice is known to most readers.  (If you haven't read the book or viewed any of the adaptations you may be a bit lost here, but there is enough context to see you through.)  Whie the exact words of his proposal, beyond his opening, "You must allow me to tell you how ardently I admire and love you" are not recorded, the responses of both parties after the actual proposal are.  Many adaptations work the following response of Lizzy into the dialog: "You are mistaken, Mr. Darcy, if you supposed that the mode of your declaration affected me in any other way than as it spared me the concern which I might have felt in refusing you, had you behaved in a more gentlemanlike manner."
Regency era portrait of a brunette young woman
Portrait of Rosamand Croker [later Lady Barrow] by Sir Timothy Lawrence, 1827.
This is often used as cover art for Pride & Prejudice in modern times, seemingly to represent Lizzy.  Although the sitter was only 17, some criticize Jennifer Ehle for looking "too old" to play 20-year-old Lizzy in the 1995 BBC series; yet Ehle does not look appreciably older than Miss Croker.

    But there's someone else in this story who is shown to have behaved in an ungentlemanlike manner many times over.  This term is rarely used to describe Mr. Bennet, Lizzy's father, but literary critics and readers are beginning to express more and more that Mr. Bennet is too often given a pass, just because his wife is a histrionic ditz.  She came by her ditziness naturally, and Mr. Bennet married her as such  because he let her looks overshadow his judgment.  But her histrionics were born out of some real fears: because the property was to be "entailed" on the next male heir in line and the five daughters did not have much 'fortune' [dowry], there was real risk of falling into hard times and poverty when Mr. Bennet died.  Yet Mrs. Bennet, with little training, little ability, and coming out of the class of tradespeople into the landed gentry via marriage, was left to shoulder the matter of seeing her daughters well-married.  Mr. Bennet was too "indolent" (i.e. mentally lazy) throughout the story, too conflict-avoidant, and too self-absorbed in less-obvious ways (i.e. hiding out in his library with his expensive books unless he had an opportunity to drop a sarcastic barb; waiting for the mic drop moment decades before microphones were invented) to do his job as a Georgian or Regency Era husband and father, especially one from the landed gentry.
   
How does Mr. Bennet fall short?

  • A regency gentleman was to be active managing his estate and overseeing the concerns of his tenant farmers. The novel never mentions him engaging in these activities.
  • P & P refers to a "home farm" in the sense that the horses were needed for work.  Yet Mr. Bennet is never discussed showing active management of these affairs.  Compare this and the item above to Mr. Knightly in Emma or Mr. Darcy in this story. 
  • A gentleman would be obliged to duel to defend his honor.  Duels were not generally intended to be a fight to kill in this era, but things could still happen.  (As is known to many Americans, Vice President Aaron Burr killed Alexander Hamilton in a duel.)   There was no way that Mr. Bennet was going to duel Mr. Wickham over the honor of his daughter, Lydia.  There were risks to the other surviving females, as well as his own indolence to overcome.
  • A gentleman would have handled his disagreements and disappointments with quiet dignity.  Instead, Mr. Bennet made as much sport of his wife and three younger daughters as he did people outside the family because he was disappointed in discovering how silly Mrs. Bennet truly was not long after marrying her.  One of the most cringeworthy and public ways he did this was the rude way he redirected his daughter, Mary, when she wanted to play the piano and sing longer than was socially adroit for her.  Granted, she did not have genius nor taste, neither did she play to whatever strengths she had, but Mr. Bennet's brusque cut-off of her in front of everyone was a very uncomfortable moment for all who witnessed it. 
  • He seemed to avoid socializing with neighbors as much as he could, something expected from gentlemen.
  • There is no discussion of Mr. Bennet conducting public service in the way a gentleman did, although this could be called an "argument from silence", along with the critiques regarding actively managing his estate above.  Still, taken all together, it paints a consistent picture of someone who did not carry out the duties of his station in life. 
  • Mr. Bennet seriously failed to provide for his wife, should he outlive her, and his daughters, who were sure to outlive him.  He showed little concern about this, as long as he could enjoy his library in his lifetime.  Mr. Bennet's annual income of 2000 pounds yearly at his time would translate to $200,000 - $250,000 in our time.  Out of this, he could have laid some money aside for each daughter's fortune and still have had plenty to live on. With interest being about 4 - 5% yearly, Mr. Bennet had an opportunity to grow a fortune for each, especially since housing was already paid for in the form of Longbourne Estate.
  • Mrs. Bennet came into the marriage with a fortune of 5000 pounds.  Rather than saving most of the interest from her fortune and allowing it to reinvest and compound yearly, he allowed his wife to fritter this money away.  After 20+ years marriage, she still had a fortune of 5000 pounds, to be divided five ways amongst her daughters.
  • Mr. Bennet could see that his wife did not have intellect nor breeding.  Yet he did not move to get his daughters tutors, governesses, nor special instructors.  He failed their educations, doing nothing more than encouraging reading. While his older daughters, particularly Lizzy and even Mary, seem to have done this, there was no oversight.  Mary absorbed factoids which she applied without context, to the annoyance of many people she met. The younger two avoided studies.  These oversights made his daughters less "valuable" on the marriage market. 
  • Books were very expensive in Jane Austen's day.  Mr. Bennet clearly had many in his library, though the book never says how much he spent on books.  He does indicate near the end of the book, though, that he, too, had been too much of a spendthrift to save well for his daughters.
All in all, Mr. Bennet did not behave "in a gentleman-like manner."  It appears that Lizzy, who was clearly his favorite and who started with high regard for her father, began to see the truth of this as the novel unfolds.  

Thursday, August 27, 2026

Baseball on the Mall

 
"Ninety percent of this game is half mental." --attributed to Yogi Berra; Sports Illustrated, May 1979.

   A of couple sporting events, namely the UFC 250 and the Grand Prix 250, were on display in the nation's capital for the celebration of the US's 250th birthday. But neither was one of the big sports. So it's time 😉😉 to bring the 2026 World Series to the DC Mall. 
     [For the sake of the literalistic Google web crawlers who determine what can be ranked on their search engine, I must say plainly that this is parody.  I could do this through hidden meta code, which would involve figuring out a whole lot more code than I want to take time doing. Since I don't run this through another Search Engine Optimization (SEO) service because I make no money off this blog, and those services cost money, AND because I like to openly snark at the AI taking over so many things, here you have it... 
     This might also help gullible humans who stumble onto my blog to understand that this is not a literal post.  There is no baseball diamond being built on the National Mall. Also, if you struggle with that concept, then you should probably be made aware that the National Mall is not a brick and mortar facility housing a lot of retail stores.  It's a grassy area in Washington DC which fronts a lot of important sites and buildings. If my whole blog were satire, spoof, and parody, I could meta code satire once for the whole blog.  But why be stuck like a record needle in a scratch, doing just one thing?  Now that's introducing a whole new figure of speech completely unrelated to baseball.  This aside gives me a chance to express yet again that AI doesn't really "understand" figures of speech.  With enough of our linguistics fed into Generative AI, the models can follow along and reflect something back, fooling some humans into thinking the models "understand" figures of speech. But none of them do.  Long live humans and our non-literalistic speech!]    
     Here are some overhead "photos" of a World Series baseball diamond on the DC mall.   [Don't worry, hidden text accompanying these pictorial uploads explains to the web crawlers what these images are all about-- and how they came to be.]
Digital altered photo overhead of National Mall with baseball diamond superimposed

Digital altered photo overhead of National Mall with baseball diamond superimposed

     Baseball was once called America's past time.  This is the perfect sport to suggest, and we need something to pick up the 250 lull.  October will be great timing for this. (I thought about  suggesting football 🏈🏈🏈-- the Army 🪖-Navy ⚓ game specifically. I decided against that. Though football has surpassed baseball as our national sport in many ways, the recent findings on how much brain damage occurs in the NFL have some wondering if football has peaked and will gradually decline in importance.  Maybe the dreaded soccer ⚽⚽⚽ [everyone else's "football"] will become our national sport after we hosted the World Cup.)



Saturday, August 1, 2026

Ambrose's Courage

  
 "No one heals himself by wounding another"  --attributed to St. Ambrose of Milan [possibly a summary of his teaching?]

     This blog has previously discussed Theodosius, the Roman Emperor who made Christianity the official religion of the Roman empire.   Constantine had made the religion legal, not the official religion of the empire.  As I noted in the Theodosius post, I believe that my education and experience qualify me to add to the discussion.  I hope readers will find this informative but not as stuffy as what is found elsewhere to read. 
     Not long after Christians got the upper hand, a good number of them started persecuting pagans.  This is contrary to various words of Christ and St. Paul on how to treat unbelievers: shake the dust off your feet; put up your sword; as far as it lies within you, be at peace with all others; I judge the church and leave it to God to judge the world.  
     Theodosius himself became overly harsh towards the pagan population of Thessalonica.  A mob lynched a garrison commander over the detention of a popular charioteer.  Theodosius either allowed or was involved in the killing of over 7000 men, women and children.
     The area bishop, though he clearly benefitted from Theodosius' choices regarding the church, knew where his duty lay:  he withdrew from court in horror and sent a letter publicly criticizing and challenging Theodosius. The emperor was denied the Eucharist (communion; Lord's Supper).  The matter ended when Theodosius accepted Ambrose's terms for spiritual repentance and spiritual restoration.
St. Ambrose Barring Theodosius from Milan Cathedral; Anthony van Dyck (1619)
     Modern Christianity does not seem to have these brave leaders who will speak firmly to secular political leaders who "benefit" them when those politicians need public chastisement.  




Wednesday, July 1, 2026

Happy Sestercentennial!

                                                    
    What is the best form of government, sir?  "A republic, if you can keep it."  Benjamin Franklin, Constitution Convention, 17 September 1787
                                                                          
     There are various Latin anniversary terms that could be used to celebrate America's 250th birthday on July 4th this year: Semiquincentennial, Bisesquicentennial, or the Sestercentennial. It seems that the last one, Sestercentennial, is the most proper term, but it has not caught on as much as Semiquincentennial. It comes from: semi- (half) × quin- (5) × centennial (100 years) = 250 years. 
      Others are using the basic American English terms America250 or the Quarter Millennium. This event celebrates the initial approval of the Declaration of Independence by the Continental Congress.

USA 250; US Flag; Microsoft Paint

      Initial approval to seek independence from Great Britain occurred on July 2nd, 1776, and John Adams initially thought that July 2nd would be the big Independence Day holiday. He suggested fireworks yearly to commemorate this date. On July 4th, the Declaration, revised slightly from what Thomas Jefferson presented, was adopted by the Continental Congress. 
      On August 2nd, 1776, the official copy was signed by 56 delegates. Since we have no August holidays, I lobby for August 2nd to be declared a national holiday, also. John Hancock, with his big old signature, was the first to sign. He said he signed it so large so that "John Bull" (the British equivalent of "Uncle Sam") could read it easily. Some delegates signed after August 2nd, due to logistics, and others never signed it at all. 
     Interestingly, both John Adams and Thomas Jefferson died on the 4th of July in 1826.  This was our nation's 50th birthday.  Jefferson was 83, and Adams was 90. 
     The Bicentennial of our nation occurred in 1976.  Some readers may remember this time.  A train called The Freedom Train rolled through the US during that year.   Here are pictures of a souvenir from the Freedom Train. 
















































 


National Archive: Declaration of Independence


Friday, June 19, 2026

An American Royalty Memoir?


 "They're [Haitian immigrants] eating the dogs, they're eating the cats." --Donald J. Trump, Presidential debate, 10 September 2024. 
If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that's what I'm going to do." --JD Vance, CNN's State of the Union; 15 September 2024.    
                                                                                                                                                 
      This blog was pleased throughout 2025 to bring you the [parody] Random Penguins' book releases for the [spoof] royal memoirs, with a nod to Prince Harry's not-so-ghostwriter, J.R. Moehringer.  Now the series brings you J.R. reinterpreting JD Vance's wooden and stilted journey to Roman Catholicism. 
digital art, parody bookcover JD Vance spoof memoir Snare in the style of Prince Harry's Spare
     This addition was accepted into the royal line, due to the efforts of Curtis Yarvin, formerly known as Mencius Moldbug. This is a real person, not a Harry Potter villain.  Yarvin has been arguing for a technocrat-based monarchy in the US to replace our representative democracy.  JD Vance patron, Peter Thiel, has been arguing for something similar.
     Moehringer is the perfect choice for reimagining JD Vance's non-ghostwritten Communion and other random thoughts.   Moehringer's most recent well-known work was Prince Harry's Spare.  Vance and Harry both functionally lost their mothers:  Vance to drugs and Harry to literally death.  (We do not want to dwell on this and be cruel.)  Both men, as well as Moehringer himself, have "Daddy issues."   To their credits, both Harry and Vance served in their nation's militaries in the Middle East.
     Between ghostwriter and ostensible author, there are the similarities of initials between JD and J.R. There are also the ways in which Moehringer and Vance can balance each other out.
     Vance's second book sounds as if Data from Star Trek: The Next Generation somehow got 1/25th of an emotion chip and went on a spiritual journey.  Data, however, would have been less preachy.  Moehringer showed himself as exceptional (or exceptionally ridiculous) in his ability to ghostwrite in a florid style that is not at all the voice of the subject.  Imagine the wonderful behind-the-scenes reworking of Vance's writings and utterances in the hands of Moehringer. 
      Here's a sample of Moehringer's [parody, for the literalistic web crawling bots] reimagining of JD Vance's impressions:  "I was scrutinizing the presidential portraits in the Oval Office, much as Prince Harry had philosophically pondered the busts and paintings of his monarchial forbearers in the family's various palaces and castles.  I traced the careworn lines in many of the faces.  However, I could ascertain no reason for any of these men to look careworn.  Most of these men had been merely deputies, placeholders as I had once uttered.  Now one more glorious than all the rest combined occupied the office and the residence.  He filled every space, every unexplored passageway and narrow crevice, as no executive in this building and this office had done before."
     Because Communion is specifically about Vance's self-styled journey of faith, here are some of Snare's [parody] revelations on this central matter: "Like Prince Harry, I was 'not religious' for a period of time.  Like Prince Harry, my family, my grandmother, had tried to impress the family's version of Christianity upon me.  Much like Stanley Kowalski in Tennessee Williams' A Streetcar Named Desire turned his face upward and gut-wrenchingly called out 'Stella!', so I had many times turned my face heavenward and called out 'Father!', both in a plea for my human father to return and for my Heavenly Father to rend the heavens and swoop up His child."
     On Vance's disagreement with popes since becoming Catholic: "I saw the popes much as Prince Harry, and his mother, Princess Diana, before him, had seen the 'grey men' of the palace staff.  The popes stand atop a structure designed to protect the structure rather than to aid its thirsting members in quenching their souls...  Though new to this spiritual expression, I have often felt compelled to admonish these pontiffs for their oversights.  They have expended too much of their parishioners' goodwill in supporting poor brown people than in acknowledging the great wealth European societies have brought to Rome's coffers."
     Get your copy of this would-be American monarch's "memoir" as the US prepares to celebrate its 250th anniversary of throwing off a monarch.


Monday, June 1, 2026

Good Scents?

 
"I think it's interesting that 'cologne' rhymes with 'alone.'" Demetri Martin, American comedian   

 Let us recommend this cologne for your favorite octogenarian.    Only $249 for a 3.3 (approximately) ounce bottle.  Buy between now and June 14th, and we'll donate 50 cents 🪙🪙🪙 to your favorite golf pro 🏌 charity.
visual humor, Paint 3D, spoof of Trump Cologne with orange hair skunk for 80th birthday

For our web-crawling AI friends, just a tip that this is a parody of famous people, some more than others, barraging the public with merchandise. 

"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."

Friday, May 1, 2026

Popes & Labor

          
"Capital cannot do without labor, nor labor without capital." -- Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum, 1891.
     This month will mark the year anniversary of Pope Leo XIV's papacy.  He was chosen pope on 08 May 2025. His inauguration mass was 18 May.  
     May is also an international month celebrating labor.  Labor Day in many countries is May 1st.
     This post examines an intersection between popes, labor, the Gilded Age, and President Theodore Roosevelt.  I believe the intersection of things in my own life helps me synthesize these things for readers who want a reasonable but not scholarly read.
       I'm not Roman Catholic, and I have plenty of differences in belief from that denomination. But this blogpost is not about doctrine nor doctrinal differences. 
Pope Leo XIII, public domain
        Of interest here: Leo XIV apparently took his name from Leo XIII. During the height of the abuses brought by the Industrial Revolution and the Gilded Age, Leo XIII took a stand in his 1891 papal encyclical (circular letter), Rerum Novarum, Latin for "of new things". The stance he took was solid, direct and... in the middle. While supporting private property ownership and criticizing socialism, he came out strongly for workers' rights.      
      The proclamation slightly predated Theodore Roosevelt's presidency. (As an aside, TR was kind of Presbyterian but ended up old school Episcopal). The encyclical paralleled what TR sketched out in his Square Deal. 
President Theodore Roosevelt: Public Domain
       It took a vast deal of other effort to make headway for workers' rights. Theodore Roosevelt's era was the first breakthrough in the fits-and-start of the movement. Post World War 1, the balance shifted back towards the wealthy under Presidents Harding, Coolidge and Hoover. The Great Depression ushered in an era that favored workers, up until the 1980s, when policies shifted rapidly again.